| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. W-Space "A New Kind Of Hell" - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Terrapin Originally by: The Cuckoo I think you're all overlooking one massive problem. Very few people are willing to enter a wormhole that says it has less than a day before it disappears, and very few people will e...
- by J Valkor - at 2009.04.12 19:44:00
|
2. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Gangs of stealth bombers and recons are going to be quite the sight. Not enough information yet to decide if it will be a FOTM, however. Given that such gangs will have complete control of who they engage it should be popular. Currently recons do...
- by J Valkor - at 2009.04.09 22:05:00
|
3. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
10% to flight time on top of the 20% bonus to velocity? Yummy, almost want to DL sisi to try it.
- by J Valkor - at 2009.04.06 23:33:00
|
4. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So this means that Stealth Bombers along with Force Recons will be the only things in the game with covert ops cloaks? How would those two ships types working in tandem do? The new falcon + the new manticores in teams of 3-5? Could they effectiv...
- by J Valkor - at 2009.03.31 00:14:00
|
5. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: J Valkor on 28/03/2009 11:44:36 Doesn't matter. Game always changes.
- by J Valkor - at 2009.03.28 11:42:00
|
6. Time to revisit the NH? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The tier 2 BCs are newer ships than command ships. It looks like they are rebalancing a lot of things right now so maybe they will get to it. The PG on an NH is crippling for PVP.
- by J Valkor - at 2009.03.26 02:22:00
|
7. Changes discussed with Zulupark - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Nighthawk PG would be a nice thing to look at.
- by J Valkor - at 2009.03.06 22:32:00
|
8. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jack Jombardo Edited by: Jack Jombardo on 05/03/2009 03:28:20 Same range as sniper HAC => make sniper HAC useless. Simpel point. As it stands now T3 is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> T2...
- by J Valkor - at 2009.03.05 05:01:00
|
9. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lilith Velkor Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 04/03/2009 19:29:09 -> offensive subsystem 2: please please please give us 5% bonus to optimal+falloff at least, as the 2.5% from optimal is pretty much vanishing completely ...
- by J Valkor - at 2009.03.04 20:24:00
|
10. Feedback on Thursday's Sleeper fighting session - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: King Hopy Edited by: King Hopy on 23/02/2009 22:19:57 We were doing medium difficulty wormhole space with a 10 man gang. 2 logistics, falcon, a cs, some bs and so on. No problems what so ever, no one came even close to d...
- by J Valkor - at 2009.02.23 23:47:00
|
11. NERF FALCONS! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If ships are slower the Falcon needs to be nerfed because it takes longer to reach them now. Speed nerf is a buff to a ship that relies on 200km+ ranges.
- by J Valkor - at 2008.08.08 16:51:00
|
12. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MenanceWhite Did you mean they're performing chainsaw surgery where only a scalpel really was needed? No. It wasn't a scalpel solution. Nobody was using Afterburners. MWDs were considered required. Statis webs were also ...
- by J Valkor - at 2008.08.01 15:48:00
|
13. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sicks CCP is just trying to do too much at once. If they nerfed speed a little bit at a time they'd be able to find where it becomes balanced. Right now they're just overshooting their mark. All they need to do is fix poly...
- by J Valkor - at 2008.07.31 15:37:00
|
14. Factional Warfare? NAHH, NANO NOOB BLOB - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: J Valkor on 21/06/2008 19:05:15 Originally by: Ulstan Quote: Yes, because heavy missiles are the only missiles you can use. There are no cruiser sized missile systems besides heavy missiles. The only other cruiser ...
- by J Valkor - at 2008.06.21 19:05:00
|
15. Factional Warfare? NAHH, NANO NOOB BLOB - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ulstan Quote: There is also nothing wrong with missiles against nano ships. Oh, come now. Almost every reasonable person recognizes that heavy precision missiles are erroneously and hilariously awful, and wholly in...
- by J Valkor - at 2008.06.20 19:43:00
|
16. Shield Amplifiers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Bumb for my A-Type.
- by J Valkor - at 2008.04.23 19:08:00
|
17. Nighthawk Needs Help - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Silence Duegood Seems the Peanut Gallery has grown quiet. Post with your main. It is much more difficult to track you down and murder you if you don't post with your main.
- by J Valkor - at 2008.04.15 03:47:00
|
18. Nighthawk Needs Help - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: J Valkor on 05/04/2008 19:56:02 What facts? Wanting to fit a micro/hams/gang mod is only a fact in the sense that it is a fact you want to fit it. But whatever, no point arguing. Actual pvp experience is trumped by "facts," I gues...
- by J Valkor - at 2008.04.05 19:55:00
|
19. insane speeds, and other insane stacking.. solution - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Every race has at least one counter to Nano. Try using them if Nano is so damn common.
- by J Valkor - at 2008.04.01 14:19:00
|
20. Empire ganking, plz CCP make it a bit more challenging - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
As long as idiots do this: http://pawsofevil.com/Killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=2183 http://pawsofevil.com/Killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=2194 http://pawsofevil.com/Killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=2146 There will be suicide ganking and you stup...
- by J Valkor - at 2008.03.26 15:12:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |